Attention to detail
No-one will ever really be certain how Jackson Pollock painted the original Blue Poles. Scholars, scientists and academics have theorised and concluded many things over the years. For me, as someone who has actually had a go at recreating his techniques and processes, I can say (with a degree of authority) that he would have returned to the canvas repeatedly over some considerable time to get it the way it looks today. It was definitely a long term thing for him as it has been for me.
I would like to think I’ve come the closest of anyone to understanding how Pollock created Blue Poles. After all, how many academics have done what I’ve done? How many scholars got dirty with a dozen paint cans? How many experts learned about enamel paints? I cannot say for certain but I would imagine I’ve got closer to what would have been in his head than someone with a text book and a magnifying glass.
Enamel paints have certain qualities that cannot be rushed if you’re trying to achieve certain things. Pollock’s line structures, his ability to overlay paint and control his wrist movements were exquisite and finely honed. They are things you need to feel to be able to understand. As a painter I appreciate the tiniest nuances and changes he would have made in order to get some of the finishes you see in his work.
And so his level of detail has become the stuff of legend. In order to recreate this kind of ‘painting-within-a-painting’ I have had to learn and practice new techniques and make some subtle changes to my paint structure. But it’s a success and I love what I’ve done. I have pushed my own boundaries and I cannot ask any more of myself than that.
A serious painting for a serious collector?
Yes, I think it is. Whilst you may appreciate the effort that has gone into creating it it may not be something you’d ever want to own. You may not like drip paintings or the work of Jackson Pollock and that’s just fine. However, if you do, then this is probably going to be of great interest from a number of perspectives.
The person that buys it will not be buying a rip-off of the original or a plagarised attempt to steal Pollock’s thunder. Instead they will be buying an accurate and sympathetically created drip painting based on one of the most important abstracts of the 20th Century. It is unique and (to the best of my knowledge) I have yet to see anyone else, anywhere, have a go at recreating something based around Blue Poles. Probably because it’s too bloody difficult.
Evidently then, you CAN put a price on that.
And, for the only one in existence, it’s an absolute steal.
If Pollock’s original, originally sold for $32,000 in 1957 and is now worth several hundreds of millions of dollars, what’s yours going to be worth in 60 years??? A sound investment me thinks!
Quote from Facebook